| | Michael: You know, ___________, I think nuance should be lauded above all else. I think if people thought of me as merely "nuanced," not good, bad, noble, or ignominious, they would pay me the highest compliment of all. Forget this ubermensh of Nietzsche.
Me: Odd desire.
Michael: There are moments when nuance guides us well, when explicitness is vulgar. For example there was a time when I desired to say, "I had you didn't I, for a moment in time, I moved in you." However, I realized that it was nuanced to the extent it was vulgar and this person's vulgarities possessed explicitness, to repay one seemed...
Me: Vulgar?
Michael: No. Futile. Explicitness like I had never experienced. They claimed to know you and in so many words to proffer and assert your salience. And in a separate encounter, that resonated with the aforementioned one, they used your name which struck me as the worse vulgarity. However, we were in such a winsome mood, I perverted the meaning of your name in such a way that still makes me shudder. However, you know I guard your name and more importantly the meaning above all else.
Me: But this person seemed to know the meaning in a way that that caused you trepidation.
Michael: Yes, but they did not the appreciate the nuances and to not appreciate the nuances of it is like copying a sentence repeatedly without knowing what it's definition, and more importantly it's intentions.
|
| | Posted 7/6/2007 12:39 AM - 18 Views - 0 eProps - 0 comments
- recommend
  - recs0
- share
- email
 - sent0
|
